(not so) random links

before i launch into this most recent bunch o' links, i want to say thanks for the HUGE response to my why do we wear what we wear? post early last week. i guess i touched on something there! i am constantly floored at how intelligent and creative and diverse you all are. thanks for reading! and for sharing and discussing. i'm constantly humbled by the fact that you stop by and are in some way interested in what i blog about or...really, anything i post!
now, on with the show!

***

-the bay area maker faire, put on by make: and craft: is this coming weekend, may 3rd and 4th, down in san mateo, california, at the san mateo fairgrounds. are any of you bay area denziens planning on going?
fun fact: i spoke about wardrobe_remix at last year's maker faire! it was a blast.
and looks like they have a TON of great craft demos and crafty happenings going down this year too, including the bizarre bazaar. my in-laws are due to visit this weekend...maybe we'll drag them down there for a look-see! *evil laugh*

***

-reason # 7658934563 that fashion trend pronouncements are a steaming pile of stinking TRIPE: the fashion industry (well, really, idiotic fashion editors, designers, and their ilk) is now claiming that the dress is "OUT" (via the new york times). seriously?? like people are going to stop wearing dresses because some dolt like anne slowey claims they are "out"??? just thinking about this and how inane and non-sensical such a statement is makes me want to slam my head against the wall repeatedly in frustration. (via a dress a day) dresses make up a very broad and diverse category of clothing, so to say all dresses are "out" as of this coming fall (??) just sounds completely moronic. like, are all brides going to forgo the trad wedding DRESS in lieu of wedding PANTS, for starters??
now do you understand why i constantly say "trends" are just a bunch of garbage? this kind of thing TOTALLY proves my point...if nothing else i've ever written to this end hasn't worked in convincing you. :P

***

and a big old stack of the quick and dirty!:
-i love love LOVE this how-to on hand-dying trims, by a little imagination and a pile of junk. bright, and happy...and could be used in so many ways. your imagination is probably the only limitation! (via craft:)
-this knitted food by artist ed bing lee looks scrumptious! (via fly)
-check out this inspiring sweater recon by one pearl button. i can think of a million stylish ways to riff off that idea...again, the possibilities seem endless!
-some super-duper pretty dahlias made from rick-rack, by made with love by hannah. would be lovely as a brooch, hair do-dad, or hat decoration, methinks!
-threadbanger's blog has a great round-up of ways to make handmade shoes...check it!
-the human ecology collection of the university of wisconsin-madison has an online archive of vintage dressmaking, fashion design, costume design, millinery (aka hatmaking), and sewing texts provided in full available for your perusal right here. an AMAZING resource for makers and designers, to say the least.
-check out this patchwork/collaged chair tutorial by dutch artist jane schouten on design*sponge. i'm literally drooling over it...so covetable, and so do-able!
-the coveted dishes out the deets on a slew of great ebay sellers who specialize in designer and vintage goodies. worth a peek!
-there's apparently a new (to me?) SF street fashion blog, called san francisco style (via design that kills). what makes it different from the pack? a huge amount of commentary by the authors on the stylish who were snapped on SF's streets.

why do we wear what we wear?

i invite you to think long and hard about what drives you to dress a certain way, what motivates you to get dressed each and every day.
what are you trying to express to the world via the clothes you wear?

***

some feel that dressing oneself is fundamentally about sex or sexuality, that what we wear is mostly influenced by the desire to attract a mate, or to continue to please the lover we may already have.
do you feel that is that true? do we put clothes on our bodies ONLY to appear attractive to others in a sexual way? is that the be-all, end-all ultimate end game in aesthetic self-expression?
or, is the sexuality/self-expression connection claimed by some too simple, too narrow of a supposition to explain our sartorial motivations?

***

could it be that wanting to appear sexy is, or could be, merely ONE of a myriad of things people want to express through the clothing they choose to wear?
perhaps are we trying to express OTHER things when we get dressed every day.
could it be that the motivations behind dressing oneself, behind each and every ensemble, are numerous?
i believe that people choose to dress a certain way in order to express a vast number of different ideas or intentions. a few, paltry examples (to which you could add to via comments, if you were so inclined!):
-they may want to appear smart or educated -they want to be seen as someone with taste (sophisticated or 'cultured') -they want to appear different, set themselves away from the "crowd (whatever that crowd may be) -they want others to see they are trendy, i.e. keeping up with the latest trends, running with the current crowd and it's zeitgeist -they may want to appear rich, or perhaps the complete opposite, someone to whom expensive things mean nothing -they may wear things that are strictly utilitarian: their clothes may be a uniform, that may facilitate or compliment their profession or an activity in which they participate -others may want to appear as if they belong to a certain subculture -for still others, modesty may be a big consideration (due to religious or cultural concerns) -and of course, as mentioned above, some may want to appear sexual, or sexy, whatever that means for a person and the type of person they are seeking to attract.
one or several of these things may be at play in why we create and wear a given outfit, depending on the person and the setting (culture, geographic location, etc.) in which they find themselves.
perhaps there more reasons not even mentioned here that are at play. or maybe none of those mentioned or unmentioned are at play at all.

***

perhaps something else motivates us to wear what we choose to wear?
maybe getting dressed on a given day is also influenced by situational factors...
sometimes, as humans, we appear or seem to dress a certain way in certain situations to express a particular feeling, to somehow fit in, or meet certain expectations. we might change our style to accommodate other outside influences or factors. we might change our look slightly or put any desire to be ourselves in check.
i can see a person making an effort to dress differently (than their personal norm) in any of the following situations (again, surely there are other examples):
-when going on a job interview -when attending a church service, temple, or other religious space -when meeting a mate's parents or family -when working at a conservative office or place of employment -when attending a wedding, a ceremony, or other formal, organized event
does the event or location to which one is going motivate their aesthetic choices, color what they choose to don that day? or does it not matter or figure in at all?

***

and what about bodily concerns?
we might wear clothing in a certain way in order to strategically conceal or reveal certain areas or draw attention to a certain part, or away from another part. one can use layering and mixing of certain pieces of clothing or the addition or placement of accoutrements to draw others eyes in one's intended direction.
-some want to appear larger/smaller in general, or may want to have certain areas appear large/smaller (bust, hips, legs, waist, shoulders, you name it) -again, covering the body in general, or parts of it, for modesty concerns (religious cultural...thinking of things like head scarves, long skirts, concealing the wrists or ankles) -revealing parts of the body for cultural/religious concerns (thinking of indigenous tribes around the world who might say, reveal the breasts as a suggestion of femininity or fertility)

***

me?
in thinking critically about what people in general may consider motivations for their self-expression, i have of course also put some thought into what my personal motivations are in expressing myself through clothing, i.e. why i dress the way i do. so, i'll spill them!

day 11.
(drawing attention to my waist, not the bust -- september 2005)

one of my biggest concerns when it comes to clothing choices is what will flatter my body, and it's natural shape, i.e. make it look it's best, aesthetically. i am almost completely all about drawing attention AWAY from my chest. i'm short to average in stature, very busty, and small to average elsewhere proportionally (at least, i was before getting pregnant!). for as long as i can remember, i have been trying to visually minimize or detract attention from my bustline (if possible, it's not always easy!). i do not want any cultural association with breasts + overt sexuality to come into play with what i wear, or make people think that i'm all about my breasts. the idea of such makes me personally feel uncomfortable...because my chest size is genetic and not something i chose to own. i honestly don't even like them much and wish i didn't have such mammarific abundance. as such, it's something i choose to downplay, if i can.
the aforementioned bustiness lead to skin issues in my teens (stretch marks, *sigh*). i am so embarrassed about the state of my skin in that area that i always feel the need to cover them up. i never wear shirts that dip low enough to reveal these scars, and if i do have on a top or dress that could possibly reveal those stretch marks, i'll often wear a tank top as a layer underneath said dress or top in an attempt to conceal them.
when i wasn't pregnant and prevented from doing so to a large degree, i tried to draw attention to the area under my bust, my waist, as well as my hips and legs, which were proportionally smaller. what choices did this lead to for me as far as clothing and accessories are concerned? belts to define the waist, very skinny/narrow leg jeans, tights, or leggings to emphasize the relative smallness of my legs (at least, my calves)....for starters. i'm still attempting some of these tricks, though the shape of my body is currently in flux.

5.2.2006
(covered up with layers at the bustline/bodice, skinny look from the legs downward -- may 2006)

it also occurred to me the other day that one of the reasons i wear my hair in a bright color and favor insanely large, colorful shiny and interesting earrings (and short necklaces as well) is to draw attention toward my face and away from my bust.
additionally, i am someone who ideally wants to be seen as being intelligent, creative, artistic by the world at large. besides the bodily image concerns, these more cerebral, expressive considerations have long been a motivator for me when it comes to getting dressed, at least since middle or high school. i want people to believe that i am a little bit of a risk-taker, idiosyncratic, unusual, a little different than the rest of the pack, someone who thinks differently or behaves differently than others, someone who has an open mind. ways i might and do express these inner desires outwardly might include: wearing daring color combinations (that i've usually given a great deal of thought to), wearing pieces with interesting design in the way of detail or overall structure, or by attempting to mix pieces i have in what i consider to be exploratory, experimental, innovative way that works within the aforementioned body concerns and restrictions i mentioned above.

1.12.2008
(all about the crazy color combos here, natch! -- january 2008)

like many, i suppose that i also want to appear 'young' to a certain degree, or at least, 'young at heart', whatever that means! though i am quite happy to be the age i am (32, thank you very much) and believe that age is not an issue and certainly not a detractor from true beauty, i also have a desire to savor what particles of my youth that might remain...if any! i must say, however, that youth, to me, suggests joie de vivre and as mentioned above, a certain sense of open-mindedness...these are traits i want to continue maintain in myself and attempt to exude in some way even as i age, if i can. this sense of youthfulness, i hope, will be tempered with wisdom gleaned over time (about style, and life in general)...and i hope that bits of both are somehow expressed through the pieces and parts i choose to wear.
wanting to appear sexy is, honestly, probably the least of my concerns, the very least of my stylistic motivators. if, by an off chance, i appear to be sexy to someone, anyone, it's not intentional on my part. i've been married to the same man for 10 years this year, still completely in love with him and not looking to snag anyone else! my husband is a very accepting, open-minded person, and doesn't seem to have any overt or strong opinions on what i choose to wear. he wholeheartedly supports my desire to dress for myself (or to suit/address whatever other aesthetic/sartorial motivations i may profess), as long as doing so makes me happy. all that said, i'd have to argue that i am not dressing with the explicit aim to "catch a mate".
issues of comfort also come into play as a motivator for me when getting dressed: i live in a mild climate (the san francisco bay area). it's often cold, foggy and windy, even in the "summer", and the temperature can and does shift over the course of the day, from almost warm to downright brisk. therefore, should i not want to freeze or be uncomfortable, i must dress appropriately. this means layers: scarves/cowls, hats, jackets, sweaters, sweatshirts, leggings, tights, pants, boots, socks, etc. things that can be removed or added at will, with concern for comfort and the latent temperature in the area i find myself at a given moment.

10.12.2007
(my version of work wear! -- october 2007)

and when it comes to dressing to address any professional concerns: granted, i am VERY modest about my body and want to cover it up/hide certain parts, as detailed at length above, but i feel that i am less modest in my color and design choices i general, even when i am at work. i feel that i can get away with this alleged 'wildness' or creativity with my professional clothing choices because a.) i mostly work from home, and b.) when i do work in an office, i can 'get away with' creative clothing choices because said office is very relaxed and has no explicit 'dress code'. the laxity and open-mindedness of the dress code and what i choose to wear to said workplace is, i should mention, is probably a reflection of both the industry in which i currently work (software/websites/a start-up) and the stereotypical culture of the san francisco bay area: it's generally very liberal, and very relaxed, almost to a fault (pun intended!).
i am sure that's not the end of what motivates me as i put together an outfit on any given day...but it's certainly a beginning of an exploration and explanation of what makes me tick...'why i wear what i wear'.

***

so, as i implored at the beginning of this post:
what about you?
what motivates YOU when you are getting dressed everyday? what might explain YOUR specific clothing choices, your special and specific idiosyncratic personal spin on self-expression?

(not so) random links

tons and tons and TONS to share today!
enjoy, my pets!

***

-seems like (almost everything) one buys these days, especially clothing, has a tag bearing the words "made in china". for some time now, china has been a manufacturing powerhouse, making many products we in the west consume cheaply and plentifully. but such plenty and such cheapness, while it benefits corporations and manufacturers and their profit margins, comes at a cost...both for many of the chinese (particularly the chinese workers), and most certainly, for us, who are about to be paying more for those aforementioned chinese-made goods (via slate).
a chinese backlash seems to be blooming, in britain, and elsewhere. china's bad record on issues like the environment, labor issues, and so forth have some talking about and trying to personally boycott chinese products (via BBC.com).
but, are such boycotts bound to be successful? who do such boycotts REALLY affect? would trying to boycott chinese products ultimately prove to be a great and complex challenge, when so much of what surrounds us is made or made from materials sourced from that vast country? what are the alternatives to chinese made products, particularly when it comes to clothing? (via the telegraph) and another thing: are you REALLY willing to pay more and work harder to avoid that which is made in a manner that you find displeasing?

***

-speaking of britain and ethical clothing: the BBC has launched an online ethical fashion magazine, called thread (via the telegraph). hopefully it will prove to be a jolly good effort when it comes to covering all things ethical fashion.
a stellar feature from the thread mag that also relates to all the chinese/ manufacturing talk above: from factory to high street: the hidden cost of cut-price clothes

***

-through a dress a day, i learned about a "kerfuffle" that occured at the recently commenced st. louis fashion week:
seems a gal named ashley dayley submitted a dress to the show made from an iconic vintage (and recently re-issued) butterick sewing pattern. at first glance, it seemed as if ashley dayley was merely a copycat, trying to pass off a garment made from a commercially made pattern as her own.
ashley later claimed that this information was well-known to those involved with the fashion show (in fact, the rules of the show allegedly allowed garments made from commercial patterns), and as such she did not see any issue with submitting a "design" made from a commercial sewing pattern to said show.
but the trouble was, this wasn't too clear from the PR surrounding the show that ashley (or anyone else, for that matter), wasn't just trying to pass off a dress made from a commercially made pattern as his/her own...until ashley herself tried to clear it all up (check the comments on the DOTD post).
regardless of what actually happened in this whole ashley dayley/st. louis fashion show thing, this story does bring up some issues regarding what constitutes 'original' design, and just what makes someone a 'designer'...
here's my take (coming from a fashion design educational background):
the mere act of making a garment from a commercial sewing pattern (even if you, say, add your own embellishment) DOES NOT make you the 'designer' of that garment, or a 'designer' period.
making a garment from a pattern may make you artistic and creative, a skilled dressmaker, crafty, and a myriad of other things. but it does not imply that you designed that sewing pattern...the fundamental basis of the/any garment.
to me, being the 'designer' of a garment implies that you created an garment from scratch (i.e. you DID NOT use a commercial pattern as the basis of your design). you drafted or draped the pattern yourself (or employed a patternmaker to do so as your explicit proxy), and in many (though not all) cases you are likely to be responsible for everything related to the design from the idea and pattern stage onwards...including but not limited to creating the initial sketch, the calculations and other technical skills employed to make that sketch come to life through said patternmaking/drafting or draping, the fabrication and embellishment decisions employed on/in said garment, and sometimes, also sewing/constructing said garment.
i sometimes sew, knit or crochet from a pattern that has been designed by another person or persons (for instance, a company who makes commercial patterns). certainly, i make choices concerning the materials i use, and occasionally make subtile tweaks to said patterns to have said patterns work better for me. i am, of course, proud of what i have done to fashion said garment and certainly consider work made from said patterns to be a creative endeavor and effort.
HOWEVER, i personally would NEVER deign to call myself the 'designer' of said patterns, i can only be the owner of the result of using those patterns...and nothing else. the original designer is the one who deserves the credit for the idea...i can only take credit for my version of THEIR DESIGN. i would never make something using someone else's blueprints and call it my own. i see it as wrong, period. all rightful acknowledgement for the original design, in my mind, can ONLY go to the person who came up with the original idea or pattern. to take another person or persons designs and call them my own, in any way, would be against my personal beliefs and ethics.
i believe that the selling of wares made from commercially available patterns is a copyright violation, not aboveboard at all...yet, people do it all the time, and it's somehow somewhat acceptable to some...
the issue is, of course, for some, very complicated, and i could probably discuss it it ad nauseam!...it's even a common issue in the fashion industry at large. opinions differ, of course. from mine, from yours.
some questions, as usual:
does just making a dress/sweater/anything from a commercial pattern make you a designer? what constitutes an 'original' clothing design? when do you believe that someone can rightfully call themselves a designer, and the work they make an original design? what is a completely 'original' idea, when it comes to clothing, or anything else?
what say you?

***

-body image issues are up for debate, both in the culture at large, and now even in the lower house of france's parliament, who've approved a bill that would "make it illegal for anyone — including fashion magazines, advertisers and Web sites — to publicly incite extreme thinness". the target here, of course, is the fashion industry, and violating this proposed law could land said stylish perps of emaciatedness in court, or sock them with hefty fines. the point, say french lawmakers, is to affect a change in the way that body image is perceived in the fashion industry, and by extension, the culture at large. of course, the french federation of couture takes issue with this proposed bill, not wanting to have to bow to any outside controls...(via the new york times)

***

-why can't a woman shop more like a man? (via the telegraph) indeed! perhaps we can learn a thing or two from the fellows when it comes to smart shopping...for starters: employing a little forethought and strategy into the purchases we do actually make, forgoing the trendy-trendy-of-the-moment pieces for the savvy, more long-lasting purchases, and saving those occasional extravagant buys for the sales only.

***

and of course....the quick and dir-tay!:

-nylon recently posted a mini-interview with eley kishimoto, one of my all time favorite designers (design TEAM, i should say)!

-quilts and patchwork are cool and rule! emily and i are on the same page, as evidenced by a recent post on her blog, go go distro, called quilted appreciation.

-and more quilty goodness: if only i could go see these fabulous art quilts at the wayne art center that fly gives us a peep at...i'd be a happy camper!

-a polka dot stitch pattern, from vogue knitting! i am itching to bust out the knitting needles RIGHT NOW and use this for something, anything, maybe EVERYTHING! YESSSSS! :D

-how to drape a bodice, a video from domestic haven (via craft:)

-from the threadbanger blog: how to remake old sweaters into spring cardigans!

-jennifer perkins of naughty secretary club shows you how to make your own take on tom binns 'no time watch'. sweet!