(not so) random links

-as if the ubiquitous skinniness wasn't enough...what's UP with the overwhelming white-ness and blonde-ness of today's runways? (via the wall street journal) seriously! what happened to that (obviously short-lived) fashion runway/magazine trend some time ago for the quirky and offbeat, the "ethnic", and the diverse? is that a distant memory now, given up for gaggles of gaunt gals that look like ghosts? i think it's really gross, and feel like it veers far, far away from reality as we know it in 2008. beauty is not just the domain of the white, blonde skinny, and tall...that's so last century! anyone care to venture as to why this particular look is the current look du jour? what does it say about where we are right now fashion-wise, and culture-wise? -real tattoos, in my opinion, can be incredibly sexy, and contain some powerful and personal imagery. they really become one with a person and their personality, on many levels. i really love and relate to that idea conceptually. but, yeah, some folks are too scared of the needles and others aren't able to commit to one design. tattoos have become a (trendy and temporary) fashion accessory: certain individuals are instead opting for being tattooed for a day, wild for a night (so says the new york times). i guess some like to only play with the concept of subversion.

-from the DUH! "tell-me-something-i-don't-know" insipid proclamation department: bland is banished - now it's primary colors (from the international herald tribune), concerning the fall 2008 runways and the trends therein. here's my proclimation, since so many are being bandied about now: bright colors aren't going anywhere...they are, i feel, the perfect antidote to cold temperatures and cold economic outlooks (which could impact the fashion industry quite harshly).

-i'm totally grooving on this hot trends post on etsy's storque about neons. YES. see previous link just above for my reasons why, so i don't have to repeat myself.

-counterfeiting runs in reverse?: did abaete rip off delia's? (from counterfeit chic)

-one of the reasons i look (primarily) for older/vintage pieces when thrifting is quality...generally, older things have better fabrication and better construction. is it just me (i know it isn't!), or has the quality of most clothing (designer or otherwise, especially the otherwise) increasingly gotten utter crap over the better part of the past decade? finding good stuff is becoming increasingly difficult...the thrifts are filled with overpriced, newer merchandise that was crap even at retail prices (i'm looking at you GOODWILL!). soon, there may not be anything good left at the local thrifts and resellers. how sad! outsapop brings up that exact issue with her recent post, recycling clothes: a dying business?. bonus: she links to an article from the seattle times about where our discards go once we're through with them. this subject never seems to die...and for good reason. said it before, will say it again: this ridiculous fast fashion cycle needs to END. people need to stop being slaves to goddamn trends. we (not to mention the earth?) would all be better off.

(not so) random links

apologies for it having been a couple weeks since i inundated you with linkage! ha!here goes:

***

-how cool is it when people take something used and make it tremendously *better* with a creative mind and their crafty designs skills? i'll tell ya: VERY COOL. even better when they blog about it, thereby inspiring hundreds with the stunning results. proof positive: these ridiculously cute handpainted shoes by made with love by hannah and this sweet sweater re-tooling by sarai of sweet sassafrass (who's apparently a fellow SF'can!) (via craft)

-good news for foreign footwear junkies living in the U.S.: there's an act that's aiming to get before congress, called the affordable footwear act of 2007. it's looking to end the shoe tax, which apparently imposes high tariffs on footwear that's been imported in to the united states (which is like, MOST of the footwear in the US these days, nearly everything being made overseas as it is). the aim, according to proponents like payless, nike, and others in the shoe trade? to lower the cost of moderately priced footwear and children's shoes...cuz, everyone needs shoes on their feet, especially the economically disadvantaged, right? i've not read the text of the proposed bill, but hey, do you think it covers those sweet italian made kicks i occasionally find myself drooling over? (kidding.)

-outsapop, the queen of the trashonistas, is tipping us off about a levi's 501 design competition (which is sadly only open to US residents, sorry!) which appears to be in conjunction with the recent denim restyling challenge seen on project runway. get to work remixing that denim: the contest ends february 6th, 2007. i'm a HUGE denim junkie...this contest is totally right up my alley! and as far as PR is concerned, that levi's episode was my favorite episode in what is otherwise a completely snoozeworthy season. but i digress...

-i guess i'll have to wait for my copy of today's WWD to read the rest of this little teaser about old navy: "Old Navy wants to shed its amorphous family image, target the twentysomething crowd and share some "big fashion ideas."" interesting move, but will it work? are they trying to compete with the likes of H&M and forever 21 and other similar retailer of that ilk? i'd be cautious: gap tried to be a little more trendy and fashion forward back in the 1990s and customers freaked (interestingly, i remember the offerings at that time being some of my all-time favorites from that store, but i am not a good person to make benchmarks from). will they try to take a risk and then shirk back again? i'm interested to see how they spin it and if they can market it and be savvy amongst other market leaders in that mass sector. my hopes aren't high for them, after seeing the whole gap empire take a huge downturn in recent years.

(not so) random links

-those sky high stilletos don't do a body good. which is why i keep mine under 2.5" and wider as a general rule. what about you? self-professed champion of the uber high-heels? flats fan? (from sociological images) -this is apparently old news, but dolce & gabbana ripped off marimekko. bad form from a company who likely bitches, groans, and goes after counterfeiters unrelentingly themselves. absolutely disgusting move on the part of d&g, and a major disservice to a wonderful finnish company with an illustrious design history spanning a good half of the 20th century. i hope marimekko is looking into serving d&g their ass for lunch over this. counterfeit chic, did you hear about this? (from the glam guide)

-love this essay by paul graham on stuff. how our stuff owns us, how we really don't *need* it, how much of it has little value, regardless of what marketers will have us believe. here's a quote pertinent to the usual subject at hand around these parts, fashion:

A friend of mine cured herself of a clothes buying habit by asking herself before she bought anything "Am I going to wear this all the time?" If she couldn't convince herself that something she was thinking of buying would become one of those few things she wore all the time, she wouldn't buy it. I think that would work for any kind of purchase. Before you buy anything, ask yourself: will this be something I use constantly? Or is it just something nice? Or worse still, a mere bargain?

-via humane recipe, via consumerist: macy's doesn't care if you want to save the planet, forces you to take a plastic bag. nice (completely asinine) move, macy's. people shouldn't be penalized or treated badly because they don't want to take the damn plastic bag. the receipt IS enough, macy's. and if it isn't, you've got bigger fish to fry, and a lot to answer to. like, the earth?